KIDO Events

KIDO for families

Before you add it to the family calendar

The best family search result is not simply polished. It helps you decide quickly, shows where its facts came from, and stays honest about what is missing.

Blog How KIDO Uses AI

A family question is usually a practical one.

A seven-year-old wants to try science. Saturday afternoon is open. How far do we need to drive, what will it cost, and is registration still possible?

  • Start with an interest
  • Narrow by age, date, and location
  • Check the original source
  • Turn the good options into a shortlist

The real question

Families need enough reliable detail to decide

Families rarely need more things to scroll through. They need the details that shape the decision. KIDO organizes events, camps, and programs as different kinds of plans, then keeps dates, times, ages, prices, locations, availability, and original sources close together.

You can begin with a broad interest such as Sports or Science, narrow to a relevant subcategory, and add age and date filters when the family calendar takes over. The aim is not the biggest pile of results. It is a useful shortlist.

Accountability

Every useful result needs a way back to its source

A clean card is helpful, but it should not become a dead end. KIDO keeps a public source link with each normalized record so a family or reviewer can check the provider’s own page for registration details, changes, and fine print.

All 9,894 current normalized records have source evidence and a usable location or explicit online mode. Age information is present for 99.8 percent, a date or ongoing status for 99.9 percent, and a registration link for 99.7 percent.

Coverage tells us that a field or evidence link is present. It does not claim that every value is perfect. The source link creates accountability and gives families a sensible next step when a detail needs confirmation.

The role of AI

AI has a job, but it does not get the last word

Family activity information arrives in many shapes: calendars, registration systems, provider pages, feeds, and long seasonal guides. KIDO uses stable feeds and page rules when they are available. AI is most useful for narrower judgment calls, such as classifying a new listing, inside a process that keeps source evidence, checks required fields, and separates review from publication.

The AI Accuracy report is plain about what it cannot claim. There is no honest single AI accuracy percentage yet. A prompt count can show how often a person intervened, but it cannot tell you the chance that a listing is right. The better question is whether its dates, ages, price, location, and link are supported, checked, and safe to publish.

Keep source evidence

Preserve a public page where a family or reviewer can verify the important details.

Use stable rules first

Prefer reliable feeds, APIs, and page rules when a source makes them available.

Validate the result

Check required dates, locations, links, listing types, ages, and record failures.

Keep a human gate

Review new sources and consequential changes before they become public.

Quality

Finding a problem is part of the process

The Data Quality report does not compress everything into one reassuring score. It shows source-run reliability, validation results, field coverage, duplicate flags, and human corrections separately. In the current retained history, 521 of 537 source runs succeeded, while 25 record failures were captured.

A completed run and a completely clean report are measured separately because software can finish and still surface something that deserves attention. A missing public image is not the same as a missing date. A provider may legitimately omit a price. An online program should be marked Online instead of being treated as if its address were broken.

97.0%successful retained source runs
100%source-evidence coverage
99.9%date or ongoing-status coverage
25record failures captured for review

The payoff

Less family detective work

All of this work should disappear into a simpler experience. A family can compare facts on one detail page, open the organization’s other listings, share an option with another caregiver, and save promising ideas into lists for summer, rainy days, or one child’s interests.

If something is unclear, Community Questions & Comments keeps the question attached to the relevant listing, where a verified organization can answer it for everyone. Trust does not mean asking families to believe a database. It means giving them clear details, a path to the evidence, and an honest signal when information is not available.

A trustworthy result turns browsing into a shortlist, and a shortlist into a plan.

Start planning

Browse now, or see the work behind the results